12
0

Hardness of Quantum Distribution Learning and Quantum Cryptography

Taiga Hiroka
Min-Hsiu Hsieh
Tomoyuki Morimae
Main:50 Pages
2 Figures
Bibliography:6 Pages
Appendix:3 Pages
Abstract

The existence of one-way functions (OWFs) forms the minimal assumption in classical cryptography. However, this is not necessarily the case in quantum cryptography. One-way puzzles (OWPuzzs), introduced by Khurana and Tomer, provide a natural quantum analogue of OWFs. The existence of OWPuzzs implies PPBQPPP\neq BQP, while the converse remains open. In classical cryptography, the analogous problem-whether OWFs can be constructed from PNPP \neq NP-has long been studied from the viewpoint of hardness of learning. Hardness of learning in various frameworks (including PAC learning) has been connected to OWFs or to PNPP \neq NP. In contrast, no such characterization previously existed for OWPuzzs. In this paper, we establish the first complete characterization of OWPuzzs based on the hardness of a well-studied learning model: distribution learning. Specifically, we prove that OWPuzzs exist if and only if proper quantum distribution learning is hard on average. A natural question that follows is whether the worst-case hardness of proper quantum distribution learning can be derived from PPBQPPP \neq BQP. If so, and a worst-case to average-case hardness reduction is achieved, it would imply OWPuzzs solely from PPBQPPP \neq BQP. However, we show that this would be extremely difficult: if worst-case hardness is PP-hard (in a black-box reduction), then SampBQPSampBPPSampBQP \neq SampBPP follows from the infiniteness of the polynomial hierarchy. Despite that, we show that PPBQPPP \neq BQP is equivalent to another standard notion of hardness of learning: agnostic. We prove that PPBQPPP \neq BQP if and only if agnostic quantum distribution learning with respect to KL divergence is hard. As a byproduct, we show that hardness of agnostic quantum distribution learning with respect to statistical distance against PPTΣ3PPPT^{\Sigma_3^P} learners implies SampBQPSampBPPSampBQP \neq SampBPP.

View on arXiv
@article{hiroka2025_2507.01292,
  title={ Hardness of Quantum Distribution Learning and Quantum Cryptography },
  author={ Taiga Hiroka and Min-Hsiu Hsieh and Tomoyuki Morimae },
  journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.01292},
  year={ 2025 }
}
Comments on this paper