11
0

Emotionally Intelligent Task-oriented Dialogue Systems: Architecture, Representation, and Optimisation

Shutong Feng
Hsien-chin Lin
Nurul Lubis
Carel van Niekerk
Michael Heck
Benjamin Ruppik
Renato Vukovic
Milica Gašić
Main:10 Pages
7 Figures
Bibliography:4 Pages
5 Tables
Appendix:5 Pages
Abstract

Task-oriented dialogue (ToD) systems are designed to help users achieve specific goals through natural language interaction. While recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have significantly improved linguistic fluency and contextual understanding, building effective and emotionally intelligent ToD systems remains a complex challenge. Effective ToD systems must optimise for task success, emotional understanding and responsiveness, and precise information conveyance, all within inherently noisy and ambiguous conversational environments. In this work, we investigate architectural, representational, optimisational as well as emotional considerations of ToD systems. We set up systems covering these design considerations with a challenging evaluation environment composed of a natural-language user simulator coupled with an imperfect natural language understanding module. We propose \textbf{LUSTER}, an \textbf{L}LM-based \textbf{U}nified \textbf{S}ystem for \textbf{T}ask-oriented dialogue with \textbf{E}nd-to-end \textbf{R}einforcement learning with both short-term (user sentiment) and long-term (task success) rewards. Our findings demonstrate that combining LLM capability with structured reward modelling leads to more resilient and emotionally responsive ToD systems, offering a practical path forward for next-generation conversational agents.

View on arXiv
@article{feng2025_2507.01594,
  title={ Emotionally Intelligent Task-oriented Dialogue Systems: Architecture, Representation, and Optimisation },
  author={ Shutong Feng and Hsien-chin Lin and Nurul Lubis and Carel van Niekerk and Michael Heck and Benjamin Ruppik and Renato Vukovic and Milica Gašić },
  journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.01594},
  year={ 2025 }
}
Comments on this paper