ResearchTrend.AI
  • Communities
  • Connect sessions
  • AI calendar
  • Organizations
  • Join Slack
  • Contact Sales
Papers
Communities
Social Events
Terms and Conditions
Pricing
Contact Sales
Parameter LabParameter LabTwitterGitHubLinkedInBlueskyYoutube

© 2026 ResearchTrend.AI, All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Papers
  3. 2507.14039
135
3
v1v2 (latest)

Online MMS Allocation for Chores

18 July 2025
Jiaxin Song
Biaoshuai Tao
Wenqian Wang
Yuhao Zhang
ArXiv (abs)PDFHTML
Main:26 Pages
5 Figures
Bibliography:5 Pages
Abstract

We study the problem of fair division of indivisible chores among nnn agents in an online setting, where items arrive sequentially and must be allocated irrevocably upon arrival. The goal is to produce an α\alphaα-MMS allocation at the end. Several recent works have investigated this model, but have only succeeded in obtaining non-trivial algorithms under restrictive assumptions, such as the two-agent bi-valued special case (Wang and Wei, 2025), or by assuming knowledge of the total disutility of each agent (Zhou, Bai, and Wu, 2023). For the general case, the trivial nnn-MMS guarantee remains the best known, while the strongest lower bound is still only 222.We close this gap on the negative side by proving that for any fixed nnn and ε\varepsilonε, no algorithm can guarantee an (n−ε)(n - \varepsilon)(n−ε)-MMS allocation. Notably, this lower bound holds precisely for every nnn, without hiding constants in big-OOO notation, thereby exactly matching the trivial upper bound.Despite this strong impossibility result, we also present positive results. We provide an online algorithm that applies in the general case, guaranteeing a min⁡{n,O(k),O(log⁡D)}\min\{n, O(k), O(\log D)\}min{n,O(k),O(logD)}-MMS allocation, where kkk is the maximum number of distinct disutilities across all agents and DDD is the maximum ratio between the largest and smallest disutilities for any agent. This bound is reasonable across a broad range of scenarios and, for example, implies that we can achieve an O(1)O(1)O(1)-MMS allocation whenever kkk is constant. Moreover, to optimize the constant in the important personalized bi-valued case, we show that if each agent has at most two distinct disutilities, our algorithm guarantees a (2+3)≈3.7(2 + \sqrt{3}) \approx 3.7(2+3​)≈3.7-MMS allocation.

View on arXiv
Comments on this paper