ResearchTrend.AI
  • Communities
  • Connect sessions
  • AI calendar
  • Organizations
  • Join Slack
  • Contact Sales
Papers
Communities
Social Events
Terms and Conditions
Pricing
Contact Sales
Parameter LabParameter LabTwitterGitHubLinkedInBlueskyYoutube

© 2025 ResearchTrend.AI, All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Papers
  3. 2510.12838
248
1
v1v2v3 (latest)

A2^22FM: An Adaptive Agent Foundation Model for Tool-Aware Hybrid Reasoning

13 October 2025
Qianben Chen
Jingyi Cao
Jiayu Zhang
Tianrui Qin
Xiaowan Li
King Zhu
Dingfeng Shi
He Zhu
M. Liu
Xiaobo Liang
Xin Gui
Ge Zhang
Jian Yang
Yuchen Eleanor Jiang
Wangchunshu Zhou
    LLMAGLRM
ArXiv (abs)PDFHTMLHuggingFace (19 upvotes)Github (3524★)
Main:13 Pages
5 Figures
Bibliography:4 Pages
1 Tables
Appendix:9 Pages
Abstract

Large language models split into two families: reasoning-centric LLMs, which strengthen internal chain-of-thought reasoning but cannot invoke external tools, and agentic LLMs, which learn to interact with environments and leverage tools but often lag in deep reasoning. This divide arises from fundamentally different training objectives, leading to mismatched strengths and inefficiency on simple queries, where both families tend to overthink or over-call tools. In this work, we present Adaptive Agent Foundation Model (A2^22FM), a unified framework that follows a route-then-align principle: the model first learns task-aware routing and then aligns mode-specific trajectories under a shared backbone. To address the inefficiency gap, we introduce a third mode-instant-that handles simple queries directly, preventing unnecessary reasoning or tool calls while complementing the agentic and reasoning modes. To jointly enhance accuracy and efficiency, we propose Adaptive Policy Optimization (APO), which enforces adaptive sampling across modes and applies a cost-regularized reward. On the 32B scale, A2^22FM achieves 13.4% on BrowseComp, 70.4% on AIME25, and 16.7% on HLE, setting new SOTA among comparable models and performing competitively with frontier LLMs across agentic, reasoning, and general benchmarks. Notably, the adaptive execution achieves a cost of pass of only $0.00487 per correct answer-cutting cost by 45.2% relative to reasoning and 33.5% relative to agentic, thus delivering substantially higher cost efficiency while maintaining comparable accuracy.

View on arXiv
Comments on this paper