217
v1v2 (latest)

Evaluating Gemini Robotics Policies in a Veo World Simulator

Gemini Robotics Team
Krzysztof Choromanski
Coline Devin
Yilun Du
Debidatta Dwibedi
Ruiqi Gao
Abhishek Jindal
Thomas Kipf
Sean Kirmani
Isabel Leal
Fangchen Liu
Anirudha Majumdar
Andrew Marmon
Carolina Parada
Yulia Rubanova
Dhruv Shah
Vikas Sindhwani
Jie Tan
Fei Xia
Ted Xiao
Sherry Yang
Wenhao Yu
Allan Zhou
Main:12 Pages
9 Figures
Bibliography:3 Pages
Appendix:4 Pages
Abstract

Generative world models hold significant potential for simulating interactions with visuomotor policies in varied environments. Frontier video models can enable generation of realistic observations and environment interactions in a scalable and general manner. However, the use of video models in robotics has been limited primarily to in-distribution evaluations, i.e., scenarios that are similar to ones used to train the policy or fine-tune the base video model. In this report, we demonstrate that video models can be used for the entire spectrum of policy evaluation use cases in robotics: from assessing nominal performance to out-of-distribution (OOD) generalization, and probing physical and semantic safety. We introduce a generative evaluation system built upon a frontier video foundation model (Veo). The system is optimized to support robot action conditioning and multi-view consistency, while integrating generative image-editing and multi-view completion to synthesize realistic variations of real-world scenes along multiple axes of generalization. We demonstrate that the system preserves the base capabilities of the video model to enable accurate simulation of scenes that have been edited to include novel interaction objects, novel visual backgrounds, and novel distractor objects. This fidelity enables accurately predicting the relative performance of different policies in both nominal and OOD conditions, determining the relative impact of different axes of generalization on policy performance, and performing red teaming of policies to expose behaviors that violate physical or semantic safety constraints. We validate these capabilities through 1600+ real-world evaluations of eight Gemini Robotics policy checkpoints and five tasks for a bimanual manipulator.

View on arXiv
Comments on this paper