ResearchTrend.AI
  • Papers
  • Communities
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Pricing
Papers
Communities
Social Events
Terms and Conditions
Pricing
Parameter LabParameter LabTwitterGitHubLinkedInBlueskyYoutube

© 2025 ResearchTrend.AI, All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Papers
  3. 1903.11367
  4. Cited By
Does My Rebuttal Matter? Insights from a Major NLP Conference
v1v2 (latest)

Does My Rebuttal Matter? Insights from a Major NLP Conference

27 March 2019
Yang Gao
Steffen Eger
Ilia Kuznetsov
Iryna Gurevych
Yusuke Miyao
ArXiv (abs)PDFHTML

Papers citing "Does My Rebuttal Matter? Insights from a Major NLP Conference"

15 / 15 papers shown
Title
Are the confidence scores of reviewers consistent with the review content? Evidence from top conference proceedings in AI
Are the confidence scores of reviewers consistent with the review content? Evidence from top conference proceedings in AI
Wenqing Wu
Haixu Xi
Chengzhi Zhang
202
5
0
21 May 2025
MOPRD: A multidisciplinary open peer review dataset
MOPRD: A multidisciplinary open peer review dataset
Jialiang Lin
Jiaxin Song
Zhangping Zhou
Yidong Chen
X. Shi
55
14
0
09 Dec 2022
Investigating Fairness Disparities in Peer Review: A Language Model
  Enhanced Approach
Investigating Fairness Disparities in Peer Review: A Language Model Enhanced Approach
Jiayao Zhang
Hongming Zhang
Zhun Deng
Dan Roth
84
16
0
07 Nov 2022
DISAPERE: A Dataset for Discourse Structure in Peer Review Discussions
DISAPERE: A Dataset for Discourse Structure in Peer Review Discussions
Neha Nayak Kennard
Timothy J. O'Gorman
Rajarshi Das
Akshay Sharma
Chhandak Bagchi
Matthew Clinton
Pranay Kumar Yelugam
Hamed Zamani
Andrew McCallum
87
30
0
16 Oct 2021
What do writing features tell us about AI papers?
What do writing features tell us about AI papers?
Zining Zhu
Bai Li
Yang Xu
Frank Rudzicz
24
0
0
13 Jul 2021
Can We Automate Scientific Reviewing?
Can We Automate Scientific Reviewing?
Weizhe Yuan
Pengfei Liu
Graham Neubig
151
90
0
30 Jan 2021
Argument Mining Driven Analysis of Peer-Reviews
Argument Mining Driven Analysis of Peer-Reviews
Michael Fromm
Evgeniy Faerman
M. Berrendorf
Siddharth Bhargava
Ruoxia Qi
Yao Zhang
L. Dennert
Sophia Selle
Yang Mao
Thomas Seidl
48
28
0
10 Dec 2020
A Large Scale Randomized Controlled Trial on Herding in Peer-Review
  Discussions
A Large Scale Randomized Controlled Trial on Herding in Peer-Review Discussions
Ivan Stelmakh
Charvi Rastogi
Nihar B. Shah
Aarti Singh
Hal Daumé
CML
77
23
0
30 Nov 2020
A Novice-Reviewer Experiment to Address Scarcity of Qualified Reviewers
  in Large Conferences
A Novice-Reviewer Experiment to Address Scarcity of Qualified Reviewers in Large Conferences
Ivan Stelmakh
Nihar B. Shah
Aarti Singh
Hal Daumé
45
29
0
30 Nov 2020
Hierarchical Bi-Directional Self-Attention Networks for Paper Review
  Rating Recommendation
Hierarchical Bi-Directional Self-Attention Networks for Paper Review Rating Recommendation
Zhongfen Deng
Hao Peng
Congying Xia
Jianxin Li
Lifang He
Philip S. Yu
76
22
0
02 Nov 2020
What Can We Do to Improve Peer Review in NLP?
What Can We Do to Improve Peer Review in NLP?
Anna Rogers
Isabelle Augenstein
73
49
0
08 Oct 2020
Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis of Scientific Reviews
Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis of Scientific Reviews
Souvic Chakraborty
Pawan Goyal
Animesh Mukherjee
64
55
0
05 Jun 2020
On Testing for Biases in Peer Review
On Testing for Biases in Peer Review
Ivan Stelmakh
Nihar B. Shah
Aarti Singh
66
47
0
31 Dec 2019
On Strategyproof Conference Peer Review
On Strategyproof Conference Peer Review
Yichong Xu
Haiying Zhao
Xiaofei Shi
Jeremy Zhang
Nihar B. Shah
100
49
0
16 Jun 2018
PeerReview4All: Fair and Accurate Reviewer Assignment in Peer Review
PeerReview4All: Fair and Accurate Reviewer Assignment in Peer Review
Ivan Stelmakh
Nihar B. Shah
Aarti Singh
59
97
0
16 Jun 2018
1