ResearchTrend.AI
  • Papers
  • Communities
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Pricing
Papers
Communities
Social Events
Terms and Conditions
Pricing
Parameter LabParameter LabTwitterGitHubLinkedInBlueskyYoutube

© 2025 ResearchTrend.AI, All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Papers
  3. 1907.08971
  4. Cited By
Are You Convinced? Choosing the More Convincing Evidence with a Siamese
  Network
v1v2 (latest)

Are You Convinced? Choosing the More Convincing Evidence with a Siamese Network

21 July 2019
Martin Gleize
Eyal Shnarch
Leshem Choshen
Lena Dankin
Guy Moshkowich
R. Aharonov
Noam Slonim
    AAML
ArXiv (abs)PDFHTML

Papers citing "Are You Convinced? Choosing the More Convincing Evidence with a Siamese Network"

17 / 17 papers shown
Title
ArgInstruct: Specialized Instruction Fine-Tuning for Computational Argumentation
ArgInstruct: Specialized Instruction Fine-Tuning for Computational Argumentation
Maja Stahl
Timon Ziegenbein
Joonsuk Park
Henning Wachsmuth
ALMLRM
31
0
0
28 May 2025
Measuring and Benchmarking Large Language Models' Capabilities to Generate Persuasive Language
Measuring and Benchmarking Large Language Models' Capabilities to Generate Persuasive Language
Amalie Brogaard Pauli
Isabelle Augenstein
Ira Assent
103
9
0
24 Feb 2025
Do Emotions Really Affect Argument Convincingness? A Dynamic Approach with LLM-based Manipulation Checks
Yanran Chen
Steffen Eger
100
3
0
24 Feb 2025
AutoPersuade: A Framework for Evaluating and Explaining Persuasive Arguments
AutoPersuade: A Framework for Evaluating and Explaining Persuasive Arguments
Till Raphael Saenger
Musashi Hinck
Justin Grimmer
Brandon M Stewart
167
2
0
11 Oct 2024
Which Side Are You On? A Multi-task Dataset for End-to-End Argument
  Summarisation and Evaluation
Which Side Are You On? A Multi-task Dataset for End-to-End Argument Summarisation and Evaluation
Hao Li
Yuping Wu
Viktor Schlegel
Riza Batista-Navarro
Tharindu Madusanka
...
Jiayan Zeng
Xiaochi Wang
Xinran He
Yizhi Li
Goran Nenadic
104
8
0
05 Jun 2024
Towards a Holistic View on Argument Quality Prediction
Towards a Holistic View on Argument Quality Prediction
Michael Fromm
M. Berrendorf
Johanna Reiml
Isabelle Mayerhofer
Siddharth Bhargava
Evgeniy Faerman
Thomas Seidl
65
4
0
19 May 2022
An Item Response Theory Framework for Persuasion
An Item Response Theory Framework for Persuasion
Anastassia Kornilova
Daniel Argyle
Vladimir Eidelman
44
4
0
24 Apr 2022
Persua: A Visual Interactive System to Enhance the Persuasiveness of
  Arguments in Online Discussion
Persua: A Visual Interactive System to Enhance the Persuasiveness of Arguments in Online Discussion
Meng Xia
Qian Zhu
Xingbo Wang
Fei-Fei Nei
Huamin Qu
Xiaojuan Ma
61
23
0
16 Apr 2022
Automatic Debate Evaluation with Argumentation Semantics and Natural
  Language Argument Graph Networks
Automatic Debate Evaluation with Argumentation Semantics and Natural Language Argument Graph Networks
Ramon Ruiz-Dolz
S. H. Barberá
A. García-Fornes
90
13
0
28 Mar 2022
Scientia Potentia Est -- On the Role of Knowledge in Computational
  Argumentation
Scientia Potentia Est -- On the Role of Knowledge in Computational Argumentation
Anne Lauscher
Henning Wachsmuth
Iryna Gurevych
Goran Glavaš
97
34
0
01 Jul 2021
ExplaGraphs: An Explanation Graph Generation Task for Structured
  Commonsense Reasoning
ExplaGraphs: An Explanation Graph Generation Task for Structured Commonsense Reasoning
Swarnadeep Saha
Prateek Yadav
Lisa Bauer
Joey Tianyi Zhou
LRM
90
59
0
15 Apr 2021
Learning From Revisions: Quality Assessment of Claims in Argumentation
  at Scale
Learning From Revisions: Quality Assessment of Claims in Argumentation at Scale
Gabriella Skitalinskaya
Jonas Klaff
Henning Wachsmuth
55
29
0
25 Jan 2021
Intrinsic Quality Assessment of Arguments
Intrinsic Quality Assessment of Arguments
Henning Wachsmuth
Till Werner
71
25
0
23 Oct 2020
Siamese Networks for Large-Scale Author Identification
Siamese Networks for Large-Scale Author Identification
Chakaveh Saedi
Mark Dras
83
38
0
23 Dec 2019
A Large-scale Dataset for Argument Quality Ranking: Construction and
  Analysis
A Large-scale Dataset for Argument Quality Ranking: Construction and Analysis
Shai Gretz
Roni Friedman
Edo Cohen-Karlik
Assaf Toledo
Dan Lahav
R. Aharonov
Noam Slonim
42
126
0
26 Nov 2019
Corpus Wide Argument Mining -- a Working Solution
Corpus Wide Argument Mining -- a Working Solution
L. Ein-Dor
Eyal Shnarch
Lena Dankin
Alon Halfon
Benjamin Sznajder
...
Leshem Choshen
Yufang Hou
Yonatan Bilu
R. Aharonov
Noam Slonim
57
63
0
25 Nov 2019
Automatic Argument Quality Assessment -- New Datasets and Methods
Automatic Argument Quality Assessment -- New Datasets and Methods
Assaf Toledo
Shai Gretz
Edo Cohen-Karlik
Roni Friedman
Elad Venezian
Dan Lahav
Michal Jacovi
R. Aharonov
Noam Slonim
67
88
0
03 Sep 2019
1