Making Paper Reviewing Robust to Bid Manipulation Attacks

Making Paper Reviewing Robust to Bid Manipulation Attacks

9 February 2021

Ruihan Wu

Laurens van der Maaten

Kilian Q. Weinberger

Papers citing "Making Paper Reviewing Robust to Bid Manipulation Attacks"

10 / 10 papers shown

Title
Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards Jaeho Kim Yunseok Lee Seulki Lee 41 0 0 08 May 2025
No more Reviewer #2: Subverting Automatic Paper-Reviewer Assignment using Adversarial Learning Thorsten Eisenhofer Erwin Quiring Jonas Moller Doreen Riepel Thorsten Holz Konrad Rieck AAML 31 6 0 25 Mar 2023
A Gold Standard Dataset for the Reviewer Assignment Problem Ivan Stelmakh John Wieting Graham Neubig Nihar B. Shah 42 15 0 23 Mar 2023
Batching of Tasks by Users of Pseudonymous Forums: Anonymity Compromise and Protection Alexander Goldberg Giulia Fanti Nihar B. Shah 35 3 0 23 Nov 2022
How do Authors' Perceptions of their Papers Compare with Co-authors' Perceptions and Peer-review Decisions? Charvi Rastogi Ivan Stelmakh A. Beygelzimer Yann N. Dauphin Percy Liang Jennifer Wortman Vaughan Zhenyu Xue Hal Daumé Emma Pierson Nihar B. Shah 36 11 0 22 Nov 2022
Tradeoffs in Preventing Manipulation in Paper Bidding for Reviewer Assignment Steven Jecmen Nihar B. Shah Fei Fang Vincent Conitzer 35 12 0 22 Jul 2022
A Dataset on Malicious Paper Bidding in Peer Review Steven Jecmen Minji Yoon Vincent Conitzer Nihar B. Shah Fei Fang 29 17 0 24 Jun 2022
Matching Papers and Reviewers at Large Conferences Kevin Leyton-Brown Mausam Yatin Nandwani Hedayat Zarkoob Chris Cameron N. Newman Dinesh Raghu OODD MQ 19 29 0 24 Feb 2022
Calibration with Privacy in Peer Review Wenxin Ding Gautam Kamath Weina Wang Nihar B. Shah 48 7 0 27 Jan 2022
Strategyproofing Peer Assessment via Partitioning: The Price in Terms of Evaluators' Expertise Komal Dhull Steven Jecmen Pravesh Kothari Nihar B. Shah 35 13 0 25 Jan 2022