ResearchTrend.AI
  • Papers
  • Communities
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Pricing
Papers
Communities
Social Events
Terms and Conditions
Pricing
Parameter LabParameter LabTwitterGitHubLinkedInBlueskyYoutube

© 2025 ResearchTrend.AI, All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Papers
  3. 2109.07707
32
2

Dense Pruning of Pointwise Convolutions in the Frequency Domain

16 September 2021
Mark Buckler
Neil Adit
Yuwei Hu
Zhiru Zhang
Adrian Sampson
    3DPC
ArXivPDFHTML
Abstract

Depthwise separable convolutions and frequency-domain convolutions are two recent ideas for building efficient convolutional neural networks. They are seemingly incompatible: the vast majority of operations in depthwise separable CNNs are in pointwise convolutional layers, but pointwise layers use 1x1 kernels, which do not benefit from frequency transformation. This paper unifies these two ideas by transforming the activations, not the kernels. Our key insights are that 1) pointwise convolutions commute with frequency transformation and thus can be computed in the frequency domain without modification, 2) each channel within a given layer has a different level of sensitivity to frequency domain pruning, and 3) each channel's sensitivity to frequency pruning is approximately monotonic with respect to frequency. We leverage this knowledge by proposing a new technique which wraps each pointwise layer in a discrete cosine transform (DCT) which is truncated to selectively prune coefficients above a given threshold as per the needs of each channel. To learn which frequencies should be pruned from which channels, we introduce a novel learned parameter which specifies each channel's pruning threshold. We add a new regularization term which incentivizes the model to decrease the number of retained frequencies while still maintaining task accuracy. Unlike weight pruning techniques which rely on sparse operators, our contiguous frequency band pruning results in fully dense computation. We apply our technique to MobileNetV2 and in the process reduce computation time by 22% and incur <1% accuracy degradation.

View on arXiv
Comments on this paper