Evaluating LLMs' Assessment of Mixed-Context Hallucination Through the Lens of Summarization

With the rapid development of large language models (LLMs), LLM-as-a-judge has emerged as a widely adopted approach for text quality evaluation, including hallucination evaluation. While previous studies have focused exclusively on single-context evaluation (e.g., discourse faithfulness or world factuality), real-world hallucinations typically involve mixed contexts, which remains inadequately evaluated. In this study, we use summarization as a representative task to comprehensively evaluate LLMs' capability in detecting mixed-context hallucinations, specifically distinguishing between factual and non-factual hallucinations. Through extensive experiments across direct generation and retrieval-based models of varying scales, our main observations are: (1) LLMs' intrinsic knowledge introduces inherent biases in hallucination evaluation; (2) These biases particularly impact the detection of factual hallucinations, yielding a significant performance bottleneck; (3) The fundamental challenge lies in effective knowledge utilization, balancing between LLMs' intrinsic knowledge and external context for accurate mixed-context hallucination evaluation.

@article{qi2025_2503.01670,
  title={ Evaluating LLMs' Assessment of Mixed-Context Hallucination Through the Lens of Summarization },
  author={ Siya Qi and Rui Cao and Yulan He and Zheng Yuan },
  journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.01670},
  year={ 2025 }
}