ResearchTrend.AI
  • Papers
  • Communities
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Pricing
Papers
Communities
Social Events
Terms and Conditions
Pricing
Parameter LabParameter LabTwitterGitHubLinkedInBlueskyYoutube

© 2025 ResearchTrend.AI, All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Papers
  3. 2205.07277
  4. Cited By
Fairness via Explanation Quality: Evaluating Disparities in the Quality
  of Post hoc Explanations

Fairness via Explanation Quality: Evaluating Disparities in the Quality of Post hoc Explanations

15 May 2022
Jessica Dai
Sohini Upadhyay
Ulrich Aivodji
Stephen H. Bach
Himabindu Lakkaraju
ArXivPDFHTML

Papers citing "Fairness via Explanation Quality: Evaluating Disparities in the Quality of Post hoc Explanations"

5 / 5 papers shown
Title
Gender Bias in Explainability: Investigating Performance Disparity in Post-hoc Methods
Gender Bias in Explainability: Investigating Performance Disparity in Post-hoc Methods
Mahdi Dhaini
Ege Erdogan
Nils Feldhus
Gjergji Kasneci
17
0
0
02 May 2025
T-Explainer: A Model-Agnostic Explainability Framework Based on Gradients
T-Explainer: A Model-Agnostic Explainability Framework Based on Gradients
Evandro S. Ortigossa
Fábio F. Dias
Brian Barr
Claudio T. Silva
L. G. Nonato
FAtt
36
2
0
25 Apr 2024
Accurate estimation of feature importance faithfulness for tree models
Accurate estimation of feature importance faithfulness for tree models
Mateusz Gajewski
Adam Karczmarz
Mateusz Rapicki
Piotr Sankowski
19
0
0
04 Apr 2024
How can I choose an explainer? An Application-grounded Evaluation of
  Post-hoc Explanations
How can I choose an explainer? An Application-grounded Evaluation of Post-hoc Explanations
Sérgio Jesus
Catarina Belém
Vladimir Balayan
João Bento
Pedro Saleiro
P. Bizarro
João Gama
109
103
0
21 Jan 2021
Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learning
Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learning
Finale Doshi-Velez
Been Kim
XAI
FaML
219
2,098
0
28 Feb 2017
1