ResearchTrend.AI
  • Papers
  • Communities
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Pricing
Papers
Communities
Social Events
Terms and Conditions
Pricing
Parameter LabParameter LabTwitterGitHubLinkedInBlueskyYoutube

© 2025 ResearchTrend.AI, All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Papers
  3. 2306.00639
  4. Cited By
Being Right for Whose Right Reasons?

Being Right for Whose Right Reasons?

1 June 2023
Terne Sasha Thorn Jakobsen
Laura Cabello
Anders Søgaard
ArXivPDFHTML

Papers citing "Being Right for Whose Right Reasons?"

8 / 8 papers shown
Title
Comparing zero-shot self-explanations with human rationales in text classification
Comparing zero-shot self-explanations with human rationales in text classification
Stephanie Brandl
Oliver Eberle
55
0
0
24 Feb 2025
Automated Trustworthiness Testing for Machine Learning Classifiers
Automated Trustworthiness Testing for Machine Learning Classifiers
Steven Cho
Seaton Cousins-Baxter
Stefano Ruberto
Valerio Terragni
20
0
0
07 Jun 2024
The Perspectivist Paradigm Shift: Assumptions and Challenges of
  Capturing Human Labels
The Perspectivist Paradigm Shift: Assumptions and Challenges of Capturing Human Labels
Eve Fleisig
Su Lin Blodgett
Dan Klein
Zeerak Talat
22
13
0
09 May 2024
Evaluating Webcam-based Gaze Data as an Alternative for Human Rationale
  Annotations
Evaluating Webcam-based Gaze Data as an Alternative for Human Rationale Annotations
Stephanie Brandl
Oliver Eberle
Tiago F. R. Ribeiro
Anders Søgaard
Nora Hollenstein
17
1
0
29 Feb 2024
On the Interplay between Fairness and Explainability
On the Interplay between Fairness and Explainability
Stephanie Brandl
Emanuele Bugliarello
Ilias Chalkidis
FaML
19
4
0
25 Oct 2023
Rather a Nurse than a Physician -- Contrastive Explanations under
  Investigation
Rather a Nurse than a Physician -- Contrastive Explanations under Investigation
Oliver Eberle
Ilias Chalkidis
Laura Cabello
Stephanie Brandl
11
9
0
18 Oct 2023
What Do We Want From Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)? -- A
  Stakeholder Perspective on XAI and a Conceptual Model Guiding
  Interdisciplinary XAI Research
What Do We Want From Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)? -- A Stakeholder Perspective on XAI and a Conceptual Model Guiding Interdisciplinary XAI Research
Markus Langer
Daniel Oster
Timo Speith
Holger Hermanns
Lena Kästner
Eva Schmidt
Andreas Sesing
Kevin Baum
XAI
43
411
0
15 Feb 2021
DynaSent: A Dynamic Benchmark for Sentiment Analysis
DynaSent: A Dynamic Benchmark for Sentiment Analysis
Christopher Potts
Zhengxuan Wu
Atticus Geiger
Douwe Kiela
227
76
0
30 Dec 2020
1